Kamala Harris Campaign Fires Back at Trump
Note: Some in the comments have noted that this may not be the official Kamala Harris campaign on X/Twitter but a support group. I am not sure myself, but The Guardian article I cited says that it is the Kamala Harris campaign, and it is why I went with that description.
Trump’s Interview Filled with Lies
Mark Levin had a sycophantic “interview” with Donald Trump on Fox propaganda, and it’s filled to the brim with Trump’s usual lies and exhibition of his dementia-ridden brain. During another insult about Kamala Harris (she’s just a nasty and disgusting person according to Trump), Trump stated that Harris “treated Mike Pence horribly.” The Harris/Walz campaign fired back with a post on X that Trump is “SENILE.”
The Harris/Walz Campaign Responds
Here is the post:
BREAKING: In a stunning senile moment, Donald Trump just suggested it was Kamala Harris who treated Mike Pence poorly. Donald Trump clearly cannot remember anything. Retweet to make sure all Americans see this hypocritical and senile moment. pic.twitter.com/PtKdY5SYFw
What Did Trump Mean?
Now, you may be wondering, “When did ‘horrible treatment” of Mike Pence happen?” And for the life of me, no one can figure that one out. The Guardian speculates that maybe it refers to when Harris stood up for herself during the one debate with Mike Pence — she told Pence and that fly on his head, “I’m speaking now.”
In fact, Trump may have been referring to a 2020 vice-presidential debate between Harris and Pence, when the now Democratic nominee twice told her opponent “I’m speaking” when he tried to interrupt her as she articulated an argument.
Who Really Treated Mike Pence Horribly?
But as I am sure you all are aware, the person who treated Mike Pence horribly was Donald Trump during the Jan 6th Insurrection.
Posting on social media, David Corn, a journalist with Mother Jones, wrote:
“What? Did she call him the p-word and incite the violent mob that chanted ‘Hang Mike Pence’? Because if she did, she probably should drop out of the race.”
On the morning of the 6 January 2021 Capitol attack, Trump reportedly told Pence: “You can either go down in history as a patriot, or you can go down in history as a pussy.”
Later, with the crowd baying for the vice-president’s blood, Trump allegedly told aides that “Mike Pence deserves it.”
Using “Senile” to Describe Trump
So I am very happy that the Harris/Walz campaign is using the word senile to describe Trump. My elderly Mom suffers from dementia, and I am her primary caregiver. Senile has a negative connotation, but I’m fine with the more derogatory word of senile being employed when it comes to Trump.
Some here will argue with me about this, but Trump is such an evil man that I have no compunction when it comes to derogatory words being hurled at him. The media absolutely refuses to cover the fact that Trump is in serious cognitive decline. The media did cover the fact that Biden was old, and I don’t remember anyone in the media calling out Fox when their anchors called Biden “senile.” No one on MSNBC got into a huff when senile was thrown at Biden, as far as I know. Perhaps the use of senile to describe Trump will break through the wall of protection the media has built up for Trump when it comes to his age and cognitive decline.
Fighting for Our Democracy
It’s politics folks, and we are at war to keep our democracy. So hurrah for the Harris/Walz campaign for attacking Trump on his senility.
Top 10 FAQs About the Harris-Walz Campaign’s Response to Donald Trump
The Harris-Walz campaign has recently called out Donald Trump for his comments on Mike Pence, labeling him as “senile.” Here are the top 10 FAQs about this controversy:
1. What did Donald Trump say about Mike Pence?
Donald Trump made a comment on Fox News suggesting that Mike Pence might not be as sharp as he used to be, implying a decline in mental acuity.
2. Why did the Harris-Walz campaign call Donald Trump senile?
The campaign responded by labeling Trump as “senile” in an attempt to highlight what they perceive as a decline in his mental fitness for public office.
3. What is the context of the Mike Pence comment?
The comment was made during a discussion on Fox News where Trump was comparing Pence’s past performance to his current state, suggesting a potential decline in cognitive abilities.
4. How did the public react to the Harris-Walz campaign’s response?
The public reaction has been mixed, with some supporting the campaign’s stance and others criticizing it as a political tactic.
5. Is there any precedent for such a public attack on mental fitness in U.S. politics?
Yes, there have been instances in U.S. politics where mental fitness has been questioned or attacked, such as during the 2016 presidential election when questions arose about Donald Trump’s mental health.
6. What are the implications of labeling a political opponent as senile?
Labeling an opponent as senile can be seen as a personal attack and may backfire if it is perceived as unfair or overly aggressive. It can also shift attention away from policy issues and towards personal characteristics.
7. How might this controversy affect Donald Trump’s re-election chances?
The impact on Trump’s re-election chances is uncertain but could potentially harm him if voters perceive the attack as legitimate or if it further polarizes public opinion.
8. What role does Fox News play in this controversy?
Fox News serves as a platform where Trump made the original comment, which then sparked the response from the Harris-Walz campaign. The network’s influence on public discourse cannot be understated in this context.
9. Are there any legal implications for labeling someone senile in a political context?
There are no direct legal implications for labeling someone senile in a political context, but such attacks can still be subject to defamation laws if they are proven to be false and malicious.
10. How might this incident influence future political discourse on mental health?
This incident could set a precedent for future political discourse on mental health, potentially leading to more open discussions about cognitive abilities in public figures but also raising concerns about personal attacks and stigma.
