UPDATE MY FAV Analyst: “Election Must Be Held in 2004 for ABC Poll to Make Sense.”+ His Forecast

UPDATE MY FAV Analyst: “Election Must Be Held in 2004 for ABC Poll to Make Sense.”+ His Forecast

Understanding the Polls: A Democratic Perspective

Since you found Purring Progressive interesting, I thought you might enjoy his thoughts on this morning’s polls. Let’s break it down together!

Current Polling Landscape

According to a national poll by ABC, if taken in 2024, the results show Kamala Harris at 52% and Trump at 45%. Just last week, the numbers were 53% for Kamala and 44% for Trump. But what does this really mean? It seems that Latino and Black voters shifted their support by 10 points towards Trump after a recent rally, while white voters leaned more towards Kamala. This shift raises questions about how these demographics are changing.

Conflicting Poll Results

It’s surprising that ABC found similar results to other national polls. It appears they assumed Kamala would be running in an electorate that is 80% white, yet she still managed to get 44% of the white vote. The New York Times found there are more Democrats than Republicans in Pennsylvania, but they adjusted their numbers in a way that might not reflect reality. Meanwhile, Selzer’s poll showed more Democrats in Iowa, leading to the conclusion that maybe there are indeed more Democrats now. So, who do we believe?

Gender Dynamics in Polls

Mark Murray from NBC shared that if more men vote, Trump leads 50-48, but if women vote, Kamala leads 50-47. This information is helpful, but it’s the pollster’s job to find out who is likely to vote. The differences in these polls suggest we are looking at different realities.

Predictions and Concerns

Despite my worries, I’ve done the math. I believe that non-response has hurt the polling industry, and we only have a glimpse of Kamala’s true strength. My final predictions are Kamala at 52.7% and Trump at 46.3%. In key states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, I see Kamala winning by varying margins. Overall, I predict she will secure 319 electoral votes. Ohio remains a toss-up, but I am confident that candidates like Allred will win, along with Brown and Tester. We need to hold the Senate and aim for 232 seats in the House. The polling industry is facing serious challenges.

Questions About Representation

There’s a lot to unpack here. Are Latinos and minorities who respond to polls more culturally conservative? Are they wealthier? Do they not worry about medical bills? In the past, when people had landlines, they felt less personal pressure when answering calls. Now, with cell phones, it feels more intimate. People are more protective of their personal space.

The Digital Divide

Let’s talk about access to technology. About 31% of African Americans don’t have a home computer, and 38% lack high-speed internet. This means that one in three Black adults are offline. This makes it hard to reach our voters, and simply adjusting the data won’t solve the problem. Black voters are not a monolith. A Black man in Bucks County cannot represent the diverse needs of those in West Philadelphia. Thank you for listening to my TED Talk!

Final Thoughts on Polling Trends

Here’s the scoop: Kamala is showing +2 in Florida, and I stand by my claims. But why aren’t other polls showing similar results? Are they finding the same data but dismissing it as inaccurate? Some are suggesting this could be a conspiracy, but we are overwhelmed with inconsistent polling that doesn’t seem to add up.

Stay Informed and Engaged

As we navigate through these confusing times, let’s stay informed and engaged. Understanding the nuances of polling can help us better prepare for the upcoming elections. Together, we can make a difference!

FAQ’s

What are the latest national poll results mentioned in the content?

The latest national poll results indicate a close race, with ABC reporting a 52-45 split if taken in 2024, and a 53-44 split if taken last week. This suggests a slight edge for Kamala over Trump.

How have Latino and Black voters shifted in their support according to the polls?

There has been a notable shift of about 10 points towards Trump among Latino and Black voters following a rally, while white voters appear to be drifting towards Kamala.

Why is there confusion among different polling organizations?

Different polling organizations are reporting varying results, with some like NYTimes and Selzer finding more Democrats than Republicans in certain states, while others seem to weight their findings differently, leading to discrepancies in reported voter demographics.

What does NBC’s polling data suggest about male and female voter turnout?

NBC’s polling indicates that if more men show up, Trump leads 50-48, whereas if more women participate, Kamala leads 50-47. This highlights the importance of understanding voter turnout demographics in predicting election outcomes.

What is the significance of the different timelines mentioned in the polling data?

The mention of different timelines suggests that the polling results are not just statistical variances but may reflect fundamentally different voter sentiments and behaviors across various demographics.

What are the final predictions made by the author regarding the election results?

The author predicts Kamala will receive 52.7% of the vote compared to Trump’s 46.3%, with specific state-by-state projections indicating potential wins in key battleground states.

Why does the author believe the polling industry is facing challenges?

The author argues that non-response bias has severely impacted the accuracy of polling data, leading to a lack of reliable insights into Kamala’s true strength among voters.

What concerns are raised about reaching minority voters?

Concerns include the fact that many African Americans lack access to home computers and high-speed internet, making it difficult to reach them through traditional polling methods. The author emphasizes that Black voters are not a homogenous group and that regional differences must be considered.

What is the author’s stance on the reliability of current polling data?

The author expresses skepticism about the reliability of current polling data, suggesting that many polls may be misleading or overly weighted, which could distort the true picture of voter sentiment.

What does the author mean by “herded” polling?

“Herded” polling refers to the tendency of some polling organizations to align their results with what is perceived as the prevailing narrative or consensus, rather than accurately reflecting the data collected.

How does the author view the impact of technology on polling?

The author notes that the shift from landlines to cell phones has changed how people perceive polling calls, making them less likely to respond due to privacy concerns. This shift complicates the ability to gather accurate data.

What implications does the author suggest for the upcoming election based on the polling data?

The author implies that the discrepancies in polling data could lead to unexpected results in the election, potentially impacting the careers of those who rely on these polls for predictions.

What humorous remark does the author make about the pollster Markos?

The author humorously references Markos’s comments about polling performance, suggesting that they were overly simplistic and did not provide meaningful insights into the complexities of voter behavior.

What is the author’s overall sentiment regarding the upcoming election?

The author expresses a mix of nervousness and hope, acknowledging the confusing nature of the polls while also expressing a desire for the predictions to hold true.

Follow by Email
Scroll to Top