TRUMP THREATENS CBS Over Kamala Harris Interview on 60 Minutes That He Says Was ‘Possibly Illegal’

TRUMP THREATENS CBS Over Kamala Harris Interview on 60 Minutes That He Says Was ‘Possibly Illegal’

Trump’s War on the Media

Donald Trump has spent the past nine years attacking the media with harsh words. He often calls journalists “stupid,” “lying,” “corrupt,” and biased against him. This is because they report on what he actually does and says. He even uses language similar to Stalin, calling them “the enemy of the people.”

Fear and Fury at the Press

Trump’s anger towards the press is a big part of who he is. He calls any news that doesn’t praise him “fake news.” Even Fox News, which often supports him, isn’t safe from his anger. He sometimes threatens news networks if they report responsibly. For example…

A Recent Outburst

On Wednesday morning, Trump was upset by a recent media event. He went on a rant on his social media platform, Truth Social. He was angry about a 60 Minutes interview with Vice-President Kamala Harris. Trump had agreed to participate but backed out because they wanted to fact-check him. After the interview aired, Trump made another wild threat. He claimed…

Accusations Against 60 Minutes

“I’ve never seen this before, but the producers of 60 Minutes sliced and diced (‘cut and pasted’) Lyin’ Kamala’s answers to questions, which were virtually incoherent, over and over again, some by as many as four times in a single sentence or thought, all in an effort, possibly illegal as part of the ‘News Division,’ which must be licensed, to make her look ‘more Presidential,’ or at least, better. It may also be a major Campaign Finance Violation.”

The Reality of TV Editing

What Trump is complaining about is normal editing in television journalism. Interviews are edited for time, clarity, and relevance. Trump’s claim that answers were edited “four times in a single sentence” is absurd. There is no evidence that Harris’ answers were changed to give her a political advantage. Trump’s complaint doesn’t make sense because he says the edits made the answers “virtually incoherent.” How would that help Harris?

Trump’s Baseless Legal Threats

Most troubling is Trump’s claim that the interview was “illegal.” As usual, he provides no evidence of a crime. He just thinks that if something bothers him, it must be against the law. He threatens CBS by mentioning that broadcast networks need licenses to use public airwaves. This is his way of trying to scare CBS into doing what he wants.

Hypocrisy and Double Standards

This threat shows Trump’s dislike for a free press. It’s also hypocritical. He never complains when Fox News edits his interviews to make him look better. He doesn’t accuse Newsmax of campaign finance violations for supporting him. And he ignores how other media outlets try to make his speeches seem more reasonable. This brings us to more of his comments on Truth Social…

Demanding Apologies and Investigations

“This is a stain on the reputation of 60 Minutes that is not recoverable – It will always remain with this once storied brand. I have never heard of such a thing being done in ‘News.’ It is the very definition of FAKE NEWS! The public is owed a MAJOR AND IMMEDIATE APOLOGY! This is an open and shut case, and must be investigated, starting today!”

The Real Apology Owed

The public is indeed owed an apology – from Trump. His hostility toward the press is a threat to democracy. His attempts to intimidate the media go against the Constitution, which he has said he would “terminate.”

Empty Words or Action?

If this is “an open and shut case,” why is Trump only talking about it on his website? Why isn’t he filing a complaint with the FCC or the Justice Department? Maybe because even he knows that he’s full of it.

Top 10 FAQs About Trump’s Threats to CBS Over Kamala Harris Interview

Here are the top 10 frequently asked questions and their answers related to the recent controversy involving Donald Trump, CBS, and an interview with Kamala Harris.

1. What did Donald Trump say about the Kamala Harris interview on 60 Minutes?

Donald Trump threatened CBS, stating that the interview with Kamala Harris on 60 Minutes might have been “possibly illegal.” He claimed that the interview was unfair and biased.

2. Why did Donald Trump threaten CBS?

Trump threatened CBS because he felt that the interview with Kamala Harris was unfair and biased. He specifically mentioned that he believes the interview was “possibly illegal,” though he did not provide specific evidence to support this claim.

3. What was the content of the Kamala Harris interview on 60 Minutes?

The interview with Kamala Harris on 60 Minutes covered various topics, including her policies, her role as Vice President, and her stance on several key issues. The interview was conducted by Lesley Stahl and was part of the show’s regular programming.

4. Is there any evidence to support Trump’s claim that the interview was illegal?

No specific evidence has been presented by Trump or any other source to support the claim that the interview with Kamala Harris was illegal. The legality of the interview would depend on various factors, including whether any laws were broken during its conduct.

5. How did CBS respond to Trump’s threats?

CBS has not publicly responded to Trump’s specific threats regarding the legality of the interview. However, the network has maintained its commitment to fair and balanced journalism, ensuring that all interviews are conducted professionally and ethically.

6. What are the implications of Trump’s threats for CBS and journalism in general?

Trump’s threats have raised concerns about the potential chilling effect on free press and journalism. If journalists and media outlets feel intimidated by such threats, it could impact their ability to conduct thorough and unbiased reporting.

7. Can a news organization be sued for conducting an interview that a public figure finds unfavorable?

No, a news organization generally cannot be sued for conducting an interview simply because a public figure finds it unfavorable. However, if the interview contains defamatory statements or violates privacy rights, legal action might be possible.

8. Has there been any precedent for similar threats or lawsuits against news organizations in the past?

Yes, there have been instances where public figures have threatened or sued news organizations over interviews. However, such cases are rare and usually require clear evidence of defamation or other legal violations.

9. How might this controversy affect public perception of Donald Trump and CBS?

The controversy could potentially affect public perception of both Donald Trump and CBS. If viewers perceive CBS as standing up for journalistic integrity, it might enhance their trust in the network. Conversely, if Trump’s base perceives CBS as biased against him, it could reinforce negative views of both Trump and the network.

10. What steps can be taken to ensure fair and unbiased reporting in such high-profile interviews?

To ensure fair and unbiased reporting in high-profile interviews, news organizations should adhere to strict journalistic standards. This includes thorough preparation, adherence to fact-checking protocols, and maintaining transparency about sources and methods used during the interview.

Follow by Email
Scroll to Top