Mayor Moves Ballot Box in Disguise
Well yes, he’s going to say that he was just “moving” the ballot box to his office for, you know… security.
Why the Disguise?
But then why did the dude dress up as a maintenance worker to do it?
Disguised in a hard hat, work gloves, and a Department of Public Works jacket, the mayor of a central Wisconsin city this week carted away a ballot drop box outside City Hall that the city clerk had planned to make available to voters, The Washington Post reported.
City Clerk’s Efforts Undermined
The city clerk sets up a ballot drop box outside City Hall for residents to use to exercise their Constitutional right to vote and this democracy-hating whackjob decides to put on a disguise and “move” the drop box to… hmmm… it says right here… his office.
Mayor’s Justification
The mayor, who moved the ballot box to his office, insisted that the public location was “not secure.”
Let me guess, the closet in his office is a more “secure” location? Guaranteed to “securely” reduce the number of locations for voters to exercise their right to vote.
Nothing Nefarious?
No worries though, as he says, there’s nothing “nefarious” going on here, dontcha know:
“This is no different than the maintenance guy moving it out there,” he said. “I’m a member of staff. There’s nothing nefarious going on here. I’m hoping for a good result.”
Yup. Nothing nefarious. That’s why you disguised yourself as a maintenance worker, right? All just normal, not weird, day-to-day workings of a mayor who enjoys a little cosplay from time to time.
Criminal Investigation Launched
As the Salon article notes, a criminal investigation has been opened by Marathon County DA Theresa Wetzsteon as it is a felony in WI to impede “the free exercise of the franchise at an election.”
Legal Context
Mayor Dougie claims that the city clerk should have consulted with the city council before placing the ballot box in front of City Hall. BUT, the WI Supreme Court decided in July of this year that City Clerks were the ones who decided where to place ballot drop boxes. Methinks the location was just a little too accessible for this Republican’s liking so this vigilante took matters into his own hands.
Conclusion
These people.
FAQs on GOP Mayor in WI Under Investigation
The GOP mayor in Wisconsin is under investigation for allegedly moving a ballot box. Here are some frequently asked questions and their answers:
-
- Q: Who is the GOP mayor in Wisconsin under investigation?
A: The name of the GOP mayor is not specified in the provided content.
-
- Q: What is the mayor being investigated for?
A: The mayor is being investigated for allegedly moving a ballot box.
-
- Q: What are the potential consequences of moving a ballot box?
A: Moving a ballot box can potentially disrupt the electoral process and may be considered a serious violation of election laws, leading to severe penalties including fines and imprisonment.
-
- Q: Is this investigation related to any other ongoing cases or controversies?
A: The provided content does not specify any direct connections to other ongoing cases or controversies.
-
- Q: How can citizens stay updated on this investigation?
A: Citizens can stay updated by following local news outlets and official statements from the relevant authorities.
-
- Q: What is the role of local authorities in this investigation?
A: Local authorities, including law enforcement and election officials, are likely involved in the investigation to ensure that the electoral process remains fair and secure.
-
- Q: Can individuals report any suspicious activity related to elections?
A: Yes, individuals can report any suspicious activity related to elections through official channels provided by local election authorities.
-
- Q: How might this incident impact voter trust in the electoral system?
A: Incidents like this can significantly impact voter trust in the electoral system, highlighting the importance of ensuring the integrity of elections.
-
- Q: Are there any legal protections for whistleblowers who report election irregularities?
A: Yes, there are legal protections for whistleblowers who report election irregularities, but these protections can vary by jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
-
- Q: What steps are being taken to prevent similar incidents in future elections?
A: The specific steps being taken to prevent similar incidents in future elections are not detailed in the provided content, but it is likely that election officials are reviewing and enhancing security measures.
-
- Q: How can citizens ensure their votes are counted accurately?
A: Citizens can ensure their votes are counted accurately by verifying their voter registration, checking the accuracy of their ballot, and reporting any discrepancies to the relevant authorities.
FAQs on Jack Smith’s Document Bomb
Jack Smith is set to drop a 180-page document bomb on Judge Tanya Chutkan’s desk. Here are some frequently asked questions and their answers:
-
- Q: Who is Jack Smith?
A: Jack Smith is a prominent figure in legal and political circles, although the specific context of this document bomb is not detailed in the provided content.
-
- Q: What is a document bomb?
A: A document bomb refers to a large collection of documents released simultaneously, often intended to overwhelm or surprise the recipient with a significant amount of information.
-
- Q: Why is Jack Smith dropping this document bomb on Judge Tanya Chutkan?
A: The specific reasons behind Jack Smith’s actions are not detailed in the provided content, but it is likely related to ongoing legal proceedings or controversies involving Judge Chutkan.
-
- Q: What can be expected from the contents of this document bomb?
A: The contents of the document bomb are expected to be extensive and detailed, potentially including evidence, arguments, or other information relevant to the case at hand.
-
- Q: How might Judge Chutkan respond to this document bomb?
A: Judge Chutkan may respond by reviewing the documents thoroughly, potentially issuing a ruling or taking further action based on the information presented.
-
- Q: Can the public access these documents?
A: The public may not have immediate access to these documents, as they are likely part of ongoing legal proceedings. However, they may be made public through court filings or other official channels.
-
- Q: What impact might this document bomb have on the legal case?
A: The impact could be significant, potentially influencing the outcome of the case by introducing new evidence or altering the legal landscape.
-
- Q: Are there any precedents for document bombs in legal proceedings?
A: While there may not be exact precedents for “document bombs,” large releases of information are common in high-profile legal cases and can significantly shape the narrative and outcome.
-
- Q: How can legal observers stay updated on this development?
A: Legal observers can stay updated by following reputable news sources, court transcripts, and official statements from both parties involved in the case.
-
- Q: What role does Judge Tanya Chutkan play in this scenario?
A: Judge Tanya Chutkan is likely to be a key figure in this scenario, as she will need to review and consider the implications of the documents presented by Jack Smith.
-
- Q: Can Jack Smith’s actions be seen as a strategic move in the legal battle?
A: Yes, releasing a large document bomb can be seen as a strategic move aimed at overwhelming or influencing the legal proceedings in favor of his position.
