Twisting Of Facts and Lawyer-Speak Rule the Day As AG Barr Spins Mueller’s Report

CBC News / YouTube Does Robert Mueller have the goods...
CBC News / YouTube

The letter which William Barr sent regarding the Mueller report is some fabulist confection. Here’s a link to the full thing. Read it and you’ll be set up to understand what national security reporter Marcy Wheeler is saying.

Now, if your mind is already reeling and you’re saying “huh?”, you are not alone. Emptywheel::

Barr and Rod Rosenstein have spent 72 whole hours considering that evidence to come up with this judgment:

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.


In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding.

Here’s Wheeler’s commentary on this material.

Here’s the thing, though: at least given what they lay out here, they only considered whether Trump was covering up his involvement in the hack-and-leak operation. It doesn’t consider whether Trump was covering up a quid pro quo, which is what there is abundant evidence of.

They didn’t consider whether Trump obstructed the crime that he appears to have obstructed. They considered whether he obstructed a different crime. And having considered whether Trump obstructed the crime he didn’t commit, rather than considering whether he obstructed the crime he did commit, they decided not to charge him with a crime.

There’s no mention of Roger Stone in Barr’s letter, and we know full well that Stone was 1. part of Trump’s campaign; 2. dealing with WikiLeaks, 3. doing so with Trump’s knowledge and consent. This fact is important because it’s indicative of the cherry picking that is going on right now, in order to frame the Mueller report in a light most positive to Trump.

Pelosi and Schumer have already demanded a full copy of the report, and, as you recall, Trump said only last week that he had no problem with the report being made public.

This is the beginning of a long, hot summer, and it only just turned Spring.

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

3 Comments on "Twisting Of Facts and Lawyer-Speak Rule the Day As AG Barr Spins Mueller’s Report"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Robert Burnett
Robert Burnett

AG Barr just committed reputation suicide, so we can say Donald helped another one to bite the dust. Integrity and honesty is found nowhere in this administration. What Barr has done was make things worst and doesn’t even know how much worst. The obvious collusion with Russia could even be seen by Stevie Wonder.


It seems Barr’s loyalty is to Trump, and not to the Constitution. He did take an oath, did he not?