This isn’t the first time William Barr tried to fool Congress and the nation with a ‘summary’

309
PBS NewsHour / YouTube WATCH Barr said Trump asked him 1553524074.jpg...
PBS NewsHour / YouTube

In 1979, the United States signed a treaty that would gradually turn over control of the Panama Canal zone to the nation in whose territory it was found. But by 1989, the U.S. government was profoundly unhappy with de facto Panamanian military dictator Manuel Noriega. So, then head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel William Barr was given an assignment—come up with a legal justification for the United States to enter a sovereign country, dispose its leader, kidnap him, and bring him to America to stand trial.

Barr did just that. As Political Wire reports, Barr sent Congress a letter on Friday the 13th, 1989, the same day as a massive stock market crash, that concluded that “the FBI could forcibly abduct people in other countries without the consent of the foreign state.” Barr made it seem that this position was the result of a study by the Justice Department and represented the department’s best legal opinion.

But there was a problem. Barr would only provide Congress with “a summary” of that opinion.

Members of Congress asked to see the full legal opinion. Barr refused, but said he would provide an account that ‘summarizes the principal conclusions.’

In the end, Congress actually acted. A subpoena was issued, and the DOJ eventually provided Congress with complete information. What did they discover? That Barr had “significantly misled” Congress, and that his “summary” actually failed to fully disclose the study’s principal conclusions, much less its full opinion on the legality of the proposed action.

But by then, actions had already been taken that could not be reversed.


The Department of Justice has announced that the redacted report, otherwise known as Summary 2.0, will be released on Thursday.

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

2 Comments on "This isn’t the first time William Barr tried to fool Congress and the nation with a ‘summary’"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Debra
Guest
Debra

I really don’t expect the report to tell us anything other than what Barr’s summary already said. All else has been redacted.

Elli
Guest
Elli

Barr is definitely protecting Trump. He needs to learn a lesson that he works for the people of this country and not our corrupt president.