The risk of not impeaching Trump

390
beppesabatini / Flickr Make America Great Again Impeach Donald...
beppesabatini / Flickr

There are many, many stories in the “liberal” media about the political risks of impeachment. The story about what happened to Bill Clinton is a common one. We all know Mitch McConnell will block it in the SenateOthers cite political polls showing that it’s not popular. Nancy Pelosi has said she prefers that Trump be defeated at the ballot box and then prosecuted for his alleged crimes.

What we don’t see as much are the risks of not impeaching. I’d like to highlight a few of these here.

Adding credibility to the Republican story 

If this is a serious issue, we should be taking serious steps to try to address it. Polls be damned. If you’re not willing to do what you can to try to address it, it’s hard to take it seriously. You look weak. Unsure. Vacillating.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 28:  House Benghazi Committee Chairman, Trey Gowdy (R-SC), participates in a news conference with fellow Committee Republicans after the release of the Committees Benghazi report on Capitol Hill June 28, 2016 in Washington, DC. U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others were killed during an attack on a U.S. outpost and CIA annex in Libya on September 11, 2012.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
House Benghazi Committee Chairman, South Carolina Republican Trey Gowdy, participates in a news conference with fellow Committee Republicans after the release of the Committees Benghazi report on Capitol Hill June 28, 2016, in Washington, D.C. 

The Republican narrative that this is somehow a “deep state” plot with nothing behind it starts to look more credible. And if you follow right-wing propaganda, it’s not a stretch to say that if Democrats don’t seize the investigative initiative, Republicans will. If you don’t believe me, look at the seven politically motivated Benghazi investigations they launched.

Brian Bueller points out that they are likely to ramp up the Spygate and “deep state” propaganda again under the direction of William Barr no matter what Democrats do. The “deep state” story becomes more credible if Democrats don’t open impeachment proceedings. If one side appears strong and the other weak, it often doesn’t matter what the truth is. People believe the side that takes a strong moral position.

Democrats will be portrayed as political

If you want to know what this looks like, here’s an article from the Washington Post this week in which the author claims, without any direct evidence, that Nancy Pelosi is avoiding impeachment proceedings to protect swing district Democrats.

This is a fascinating article to read, by the way. It’s an opinion article with no actual quotes or evidence from Nancy Pelosi that this is indeed what she’s doing. But the article reads as fact. The author makes blanket assumptions about motivation without any direct supporting evidence:

But the moral and practical reasons for impeachment — however valid they may be — don’t stand up to Pelosi’s political concerns that impeachment would jeopardize her hard-won majority.

Don’t get me wrong. The author may be right in her assumptions that politics is the issue. I just haven’t seen any direct evidence that this is the case. The author is the only person claiming it is. If the House doesn’t begin impeachment hearings, the question people will ask is: Why not?

Whether it is or not, it looks like a political calculation. I can understand why this argument would hold water with many if Pelosi doesn’t pursue impeachment.

If you’re not willing to fight for people, people aren’t willing to fight for you   

One of the reasons I often hear about why people like Donald Trump is that they say he’s fighting for them. He’s not. But he looks like he’s fighting. He picks fights. Conservative talk radio host Joe Walsh described it like this:

When Nancy Pelosi fought Trump over his wall with Mexico, her approval ratings reached their highest since 2007.  It could be argued that this was because she won the fight. Her ratings gradually increased though even when it wasn’t known whether she would win or not. I believe they increased because she picked a strong moral fight.

The case for impeachment is a strong moral fight. The greater danger to me seems like looking like we’re not doing anything or, even worse, protecting the establishment.

David Akadjian is the author of  The Little Book of Revolution: A Distributive Strategy for Democracy (ebook now available).

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

3 Comments on "The risk of not impeaching Trump"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Diana
Guest
Diana

I used to say “No impeachment”, Because I don’t want Pence as President to be able to push his Far right wing religious positions, AND because I’m afraid he will pardon Trump. BUT NO LONGER. I NOW SAY IMPEACH, because it is the right thing to do. IF tRUMP is not impeached, he is laying the groundwork to refuse to leave office and take over as a STRONGMAN with Russia’s help. IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEACH NOW NOW NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Impeach trump
Guest
Impeach trump

Impeach him now and uphold the rule of law for our country-for once DO the right thing before someone takes the law into their own hands and
Who knows what the outcome will be…We are a nation of laws and need to rise above the lies of trump and his criminal administration before we are drug FURTHER DOWN BY this demented old man

carol jay
Guest
carol jay

very simple she doesnt impeach or start impeachment inquiry he shouts no impeachment I told you it was a hoax and witchhunt. The prrof is there for impeachment he has checked off many of theboxes under high crimes and misdemeanors