Strongest Signs Yet of Imminent Impeachment Inquiry: Real Signs

340
Fox Business / YouTube Pelosi says Trump s immigration plan...
Fox Business / YouTube

Our friend Jennifer Rubin, columnist for the Washington Post, whom we quoted earlier in the week as a conservative no longer tolerating any Trump supporter, has a piece documenting some fast-moving developments pertaining to Trump’s troubles.

Undeniable signs jump out of a story gleaned from the Washington Post According to Rubin, the House Judiciary Committee has gone to federal court seeking an order to compel former White House counsel Donald McGahn’s testimony. McGahn, as you likely recall, seemed ready to testify to congress, but faced serious threats from a White House claiming “executive privilege.”

This matters, because according to the story, House Democrats consider McGahn their most critical witness. McGahn witnessed firsthand Trump’s most desperate attempts to rid himself of that meddlesome “people’s House.”

It’s right there in the complaint: “The Judiciary Committee is now determining whether to recommend articles of impeachment against the President based on the obstructive conduct described by the Special Counsel.”…

…Let’s dispense with the nonsense that Pelosi is still blocking impeachment. “That process is underway,” the complaint plainly states.’

Wait, what?

Pelosi blocking the impeachment process is nonsense? The process is well underway? That might well qualify as news. Of course, the fact that the House wants Executive privilege – as claimed in total by the Trump administration – sent to its room, which in this case is a courtroom, never to return – is not news. But …

Let’s analyze.

I have told everyone who would listen that litigation takes a tortuous length of time. It also requires several pre-litigation steps, including “oh so reasonable letters” that get mocked by the left as “worthless.” Believe me, nothing is worth more to some judges, whose attitude is often: “What in the ever-living hell are you doing here? (looking at the president’s defense council). “The Committee set out the law plainly in a letter to you and offered reasonable accommodation. Yet here you are, wasting my time.” In other words, those loathed letters matter. Judges actually do not like people who rush to court when the problem may have been solved by … well, a letter.

The other thing that matters? Getting your damn ducks in formation prior to litigation. You do not file your complaint until you possess everything you believe you will need to succeed. Only then do you file the initial documents, which allows you to quickly file your “Motion to Win.” (Which don’t exist, except inside giggling lawyers’ heads. Little inside humor there.)

The thing that matters most is the news of the day. Pelosi is on board with an impeachment inquiry? Fascinating, since she has done a marvelous job keeping that hidden, to the point where I am still unsure if it is actually true, or a courtroom tactic. Though, I gotta tell you, lying to a judge about your motivations or the facts behind it, is the quickest way to find yourself handed an “Order to lose” signed by a judge pondering whether you need further sanctions.

I do not think they’re fcking around here.

I find that appropriate, since it seems to me that Trump has been ffff, messing around the entire time.

There IS a legitimate reason for executive privilege. A president must be able to discuss policy with his advisors without fear that those advisors will be forced to yak it up all over congress. Executive privilege is not, however, a blanket privilege to hide everything embarrassing, including volcanic toddler-like behavior, or covering up a crime. I might note that the above two are not mutually exclusive.

If Trump succeeds in his claim for the breadth of this privilege, we are not all equal under the law anymore.

This feels real. Is there a crack in the earth between the hill and the White House? I would volunteer work a jack hammer to widen it, if so.

Anyone want to volunteer to bring chips and drinks while we have at it?

****

Peace, y’all. It is nice to have some good news, finally.

Jason

  • My usual disclaimer. An impeachment inquiry is not useful as a tool to remove Trump prior to an election. It is highly useful in dumping his trash all over the headlines and forcing him to run against it. Such a tactic enhances the odds that he will be removed from office, in an election, which couldn’t matter more.
Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

3 Comments on "Strongest Signs Yet of Imminent Impeachment Inquiry: Real Signs"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
DHG
Guest

Interesting development here

Dee
Guest

Still gotta say hit them where it counts, campaign funding, dont donate to act blue and the like till impeachment has been well underway publicly stated by all the house leaders. Till then treat them exactly as you would a Republican

Rick
Guest
Rick

I’m a chef and I’lll bring the food for everyone