Jamelle Bouie / Flickr rand paul...
Jamelle Bouie / Flickr


Days after President Joe Biden took office and the Democrats took control of the U.S. Senate, Sen. Rand Paul would not unequivocally say Sunday that the 2020 presidential election was free and fair and called for an investigation of fraud, without providing evidence.

“The debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question,” Paul said on ABC’s “This Week.”

“Sen. Paul, I have to stop you there,” ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos interjected. “No election is perfect, but there were 86 challenges filed by President Trump and his allies in court. All were dismissed. Every state certified the results … after investigations, counts and recounts. The Department of Justice — led by William Barr — said there’s no widespread evidence of fraud. Can’t you just say the words: ‘This election was not stolen?'”

Paul responded, “What I would suggest is that if we want greater confidence in our elections — and 75% of Republicans agree with me — is that we do need to look at election integrity.”

Across the country, secretaries of state and officials at the federal level — including the Trump-appointed former attorney general — have agreed that there was no evidence of widespread fraud or security concerns in November’s election.

When challenged by Stephanopoulos on Barr’s denial of widespread fraud, Paul pushed back.

“He said that, yes. That was a pronouncement. There’s been no examination — thorough examination — of all the states to see what problems we had and see if they could fix them,” he said.

“There were lots of problems and there were secretaries of state, who illegally changed the law and that needs to be fixed, and I’m going to work harder to fix it and I will not be cowed by people saying ‘oh, you’re a liar,'” Paul told Stephanopoulos. “And you can’t just sweep it under the rug and say, ‘oh, nothing to see here, and everybody is a liar and you’re a fool if you bring this up.’ … A journalist would hear both sides and there are two sides of a story.”

Stephanopoulos responded, “I’m standing by facts. There are not two sides to facts. I did not say this was a perfect election. I say the results were certified. I said it was not stolen. It is a lie,”

PHOTO: Sen. Rand Paul listens during the confirmation hearing oF Anthony J. Blinken to be Secretary of State before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the Capitol, Jan. 19, 2021. (Alex Edelman/Pool via Reuters)

While Paul was one of the many Republican politicians who repeated unfounded Trump allegations that fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential election, the Kentucky senator did not object to the certification of the electoral college and has said previously that he thinks Congress should not overturn results as it would be unconstitutional.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., responded to Paul’s remarks in a separate interview on “This Week.”

“As I listened to Rand Paul, George, I just kept thinking, ‘man, this is why Joe Biden won,'” she told Stephanopoulos.

“American people right now are struggling. They need pandemic relief,” Klobuchar continued. “I thoroughly believe that we can handle this impeachment trial and — just as the American people are doing — juggle what we need to get done.

The Senate is preparing for a packed legislative schedule with Democrats attempting to balance the Biden administration’s agenda with the second impeachment trial of Trump.

MORE: Biden Cabinet picks feature record number of women and women of color

Despite earlier reports that McConnell was pleased with the House of Representatives’ impeachment efforts, a growing number of conservative legal experts and Republicans in the Senate have challenged the constitutionality of holding a trial for Trump since he is no longer the sitting president.

When asked by Stephanopoulos about questions behind the legality of the impending impeachment trial, Klobuchar said, “It is constitutional. We have precedent from way back when a secretary of war was tried after he had left office and, obviously, there’s a remedy that would help in the future which would ban former President Trump from running again.”

With more Republicans touting the lack of constitutional basis for the trial, Stephanopoulos also pressed Klobuchar about whether there were enough GOP senators to vote to convict Trump.

“My colleagues have not yet committed about what they’re going to do and the news we just got out of The New York Times yesterday that the president was actually actively trying to take out his own attorney general and put in an unknown bureaucrat conspiring with him. I think we’re going to get more and more evidence over the next few weeks as if it’s not enough that he’s sent an angry mob down the Mall to invade the Capitol — didn’t try to stop it — and a police officer was killed. I don’t really know what else you need to know,” the Minnesota senator added.

MORE: Early indications show honeymoon period for Biden administration: POLL

Stephanopoulos also asked about what happens if there aren’t enough votes in the Senate to convict Trump.

“Would you pursue, instead, either a censure or some kind of a resolution under the 14th Amendment to prevent President Trump from running for office again?” Stephanopoulos asked.

She refused to rule anything out.

“We’re focused on impeachment, but there are many options. Things can be looked at. But I think the thing that your viewers need to know right now, George, is that we must do many things at once,” she said.


Liked it? Take a second to support Associate Editor on Patreon!


  1. Rand is a simple creature, motivated by simple forces, power, greed, the deep seated and grotesque need to get the world under his thumb.

    He will demand a needless investigation, saying I have doubts.
    If he doesn’t get his investigation he’ll claim it was all swept under the rug.
    If he does get it, he’ll claim just the fact of having an investigation proves wrongdoing, and we need to skip all sane parts right to punishment.

    He’s made in the image of his ideological Father, Mitch. So being the greedy, ambition crap-stack he is, he wants to take Mitch’s place now. What he needs instead is to be shown to a door… preferably one with bar that locks from the outside.

  2. I don’t think anyone in its right frame of mind takes this idiot seriously. As his father he may have some hereditary disorder …. How is that his electorate is still keeping him >

  3. The reason the election was believed to be unfair and challenged is because of Trump and his allies. People trusted elections before Trump! He’s the reason 75% of Republicans question elections now. Mail-in ballots were just a convenient way for Trump to question the election even before it occurred. If there had been no mail-in ballots, he would have found something else! He questioned votes in 2016, but it didn’t matter much then since Trump miraculously beat Clinton. There’s no way of pleasing these people! They need to be removed from office. Trump was very successful in one important way; he sufficiently changed people’s perception of truth with his own version of lies! Fascism, you say. Yes, fascism!!

  4. Rand Paul is one of those little mice with a big mouth. He has a small man syndrome. Look back his neighbor almost put him in a trash bag, because if his mouth. He needed trump to protect him from the big boys. This mouth has to be gone vote his ass out let him go to Florida and play grab the crouch with trump.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here