Romney makes up new ‘precedent’ to say he’ll vote on a Trump Supreme Court nominee

215
 / YouTube Mitt Romney won t oppose Senate 1600791917.jpg...
/ YouTube

Sen. Willard Mitt Romney, the Republican from Utah who broke ranks with Republicans to vote to convict Donald Trump on one of the articles of impeachment, abuse of power, has snapped back into line when it matters most: a Trump Supreme Court nominee. He says his decision isn’t based on “a subjective test of ‘fairness’ which, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder,” but on “the Constitution and precedent.” And then makes up some real bullshit on precedent: “The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own.” Except for when a Democratic Senate confirmed Ronald Reagan’s nominee, Anthony Kennedy, in 1988.

“The historical precedent of election year nominations is that the Senate generally does not confirm an opposing party’s nominee but does confirm a nominee of its own,” he says. Historical precedent set by Mitch McConnell in 2016 in order to steal a Supreme Court seat from President Barack Obama. Maybe in the future we’ll have to call it the Romney Doctrine, just to cement for history how pathetic he is.

This means McConnell has the votes. He doesn’t know (supposedly) the nominee yet, but he’s got the votes. It’s worth noting that he’s been sitting on the HEROES Act coronavirus relief bill for four months without acting, but will try to push a Supreme Court nominee in five weeks. It means that Sen. Susan Collins now has permission from McConnell to vote against the nominee, if she thinks that will save her pathetic political skin, because he doesn’t need her vote. It will be too little, too late for Collins, but that’s what will happen.

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

3 Comments on "Romney makes up new ‘precedent’ to say he’ll vote on a Trump Supreme Court nominee"

avatar
newest oldest most voted
Surya-Patricia Lane Hood
Guest
Surya-Patricia Lane Hood

You are not accurate. The appointment would have to take place before the election. McSally was appointed not elected. According to Arizona law, Mark Kelly, who is double digits ahead of her, would become Senator immediately after his election is certified. With Collins and Murkowski saying them will oppose appointing anyone until after the election, it will only take 1 (ONE) other Republican who is battling re-election to turn Moscow Mitch’s dreams into a nightmare.

Cyn Finnegan
Guest
Cyn Finnegan

Nice thing is that SCOTUS “justices” like Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch CAN BE IMPEACHED AND REMOVVED. FOR INCOMPETENCE.

Cyn Finnegan
Guest
Cyn Finnegan

“REMOVED.” Sorry.