Republicans hate the RNC’s new mandatory, shady fundraising tool. Guess who profits off it?

548
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs / Flickr trump kushner israel...
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs / Flickr

Thursday kicked off the House Republicans’ annual retreat, and featured a compulsory presentation on the GOP’s answer to ActBlue, the grassroots, small-donor platform that Democrats have been using for well over a decade. It did not go well at all, according to POLITICO. House Republicans openly argued with Trump/RNC political operatives over the Jared Kushner-pushed initiative.

The new tool is called WinRed, and it was initially released in June. To say that it is problem-plagued would be an understatement.  Suffice it to say that it is the antithesis of ActBlue—in more ways than one. Despite the obvious, that it’s a tool designed to help conservative candidates, the GOP’s new tool is:

    • convoluted to use,
    • for-profit (whereas ActBlue is nonprofit),
    • secretive about plans for donors’ data,
    • being forced upon candidates to use through “veiled threats”,
    • and can take quite a large percentage of whatever donation is given.

    According to David Nir:

    For starters, there’s the grifty fee structure: While ActBlue charges a flat 3.95% per contribution, WinRed takes a 3.8% cut plus 30 cents per transaction. That might not sound like a big difference, but it’s huge. On a $5 contribution, ActBlue will net 20 cents. WinRed, however, will take 49 cents, which in percentage terms is a giant 9.8%.

    What’s more, on a contribution page that lists multiple campaigns, it sounds like WinRed will get 30 cents per donation. (From the site itself: “There is a 3.8% + 30 cents per transaction fee with each donation made.”) In other words, if you split $25 across five candidates, that’s a cool $2.45 for WinRed. ActBlue would take less than a buck.

    But that’s not all.

    WinRed has quite a few privacy and security concerns as well. Members of Congress ”can’t get straight answers about what’s going to happen with their data.” That’s not something donors want to hear. However, GOP lawmakers at the retreat seemed less concerned about their donors’ information ending up in criminal hands as they were worried that their primary opponent might scoop that info, since all the data goes to the RNC’s clearinghouse firm, Data Trust.

    By the way, if you thought you heard of Data Trust before, it’s because their records were involved in that massive data leak in 2017, where the personal information of millions of people—including birthdates, cell numbers, and addresses—was exposed when it was accidentally put on a publicly accessible Amazon server.

    Bottom line: WinRed sucks. The candidates don’t trust it. The donors don’t like using it. The only reason it’s being used is because everyone is being coerced, which is slightly ironic given how much lip service the GOP gives to their supposed belief in the free market.

    Several GOP candidates have complained that there was a competitor that actually did work, wasn’t secretive, and had lower fees. Give.GOP was gaining traction with a lot of candidates, but it’s parent company was recently given a cease and desist letter by the RNC, which forbade them from using any kind of GOP branding.

    So the big question….. why would the RNC pick sides in a fight between for-profit competitors?

    Since the RNC and the Trump 2020 campaign officially merged last year, Donald Trump has been calling the shots, and he made it clear that he wants everyone using WinRed. The platform is being forced upon the National Republican Senate Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee as well. Trump actually shilled for WinRed when it went live.

    So, the short answer is that Trump wants it, and what Trump wants, Trump gets in his new GOP.

    But why does Trump want to force everyone to use such a crappy fundraising tool that no one likes?

    Well …

    What Trump’s announcement did not mention was that the decision to use “WinRed” will potentially funnel millions of extra dollars to a firm owned by Gerrit Lansing, a former RNC staffer who left his White House job only three weeks into the administration after reportedly failing his FBI background screening.

    What’s more, about two-thirds of the total processing fee is used to pay Stripe, the credit-card processing company that saw a $30 million investment from Joshua Kushner’s Thrive Capital in 2014.

    Joshua Kushner is presidential son-in-law and White House aide Jared Kushner’s younger brother.

    Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

    WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 17:  U.S. President Donald Trump (C) walks along the West Wing colonnade with his daughter Ivanka Trump (L) and his son-in-law and Senior Advisor to the President for Strategic Planning Jared Kushner before he departs the White House March 17, 2017 in Washington, DC. The first family is scheduled to spend the weekend at their Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
    Trump with the Jarvanka…

    See, that’s how it always works in Trumpland.

    The victor is always the Trump family and their immediate friends.

    —Rick Wilson, Republican political consultant

    Duh.

    Since 2004, ActBlue has brought in 3.5 billion dollars for progressive candidates. Just imagine the money to be made by Kushner the younger if WinRed manages to gain a foothold and get even a small percentage of that kind of success.

    Every day I learn about a new grift from this president. At least this one only hurts his supporters, for whom I have zero sympathy.

    Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

    Leave a Comment

    4 Comments on "Republicans hate the RNC’s new mandatory, shady fundraising tool. Guess who profits off it?"

    avatar
      Subscribe  
    newest oldest most voted
    Notify of
    Chris Whitley
    Guest
    Chris Whitley

    Dumb enough to support trump, dumb enough to support trump dynasty. They have only been themselves to blame.

    fishouttaH2o
    Guest
    fishouttaH2o
    The Republicans put up with this because ???? Seriously. Do you think Putin’s shared the compromising information he has on our political figures with trump & Moscow Mitch & they use blackmail to make them fall in line? They weren’t spineless with past Presidents. Why now? The few with a spine have announced their retirement & they’re fleeing the Republican Party or were they told to get out because there’s a more “conservative” trump sycophant they want to run perhaps? Interesting times we’re living in. It’s not a good thing. I’d rather be accustomed to the mundane when I didn’t… Read more »
    Gunther
    Guest
    Gunther

    Kushner needs to spend the next 3 decades getting his ham slammed in a prison shower.

    Donna Doggett
    Guest
    Donna Doggett

    I’d vote that up 1000x’s if I could 😂.