Rebel HQ / YouTube Alexandria Ocasio Cortez s Political Revolution 1543887144.jpg...
Rebel HQ / YouTube

On Saturday, Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) fired back at outgoing Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), launching into a Twitter thread that called out McCaskill for word choices that rang a little too close to Republicanisms.

Where did this start? Before we get into Ocascio-Cortez’s response, let’s review the interview between CNN and McCaskill that started the whole situation.

In an exit interview with CNN this past week, McCaskill (who lost her re-election bid to Trump-supported Republican Josh Hawley this November) gave some…interesting comments about Ocascio-Cortez (and the progressive left in general), including the following:

“I’m a little confused why she’s the thing. But it’s a good example of what I’m talking about — a bright shiny new object, came out of nowhere and surprised people when she beat a very experienced congressman.”

Right off the bat, policy aside, describing a woman as an “object” or a “thing” both reek of misogyny, no matter the gender identity of the person saying it.

She continued:

“And so she’s now talked about a lot. I’m not sure what she’s done yet to generate that kind of enthusiasm, but I wish her well. I hope she hangs the moon. But I hope she also realizes that the parts of the country that are rejecting the Democratic Party, like a whole lot of white working class voters, need to hear about how their work is going to be respected, and the dignity of their jobs, and how we can really stick to issues that we can actually accomplish something on.”

To be disappointed in McCaskill’s choice of words is to put it lightly. Patronizing and tinged with misogyny, her comments rang uncomfortably close to the sorts of criticism Ocasio-Cortez has received about the cost of her wardrobe and where she attended high school.

It’s no surprises that Ocasio-Cortez responded on Twitter:

In an interview The Daily (the New York Times podcast), McCaskill suggested that people are “fascinated” with Ocasio-Cortez. She also warned against Democrats going “so far to the left” when discussing 2020 presidential nominations. Why? Fear of losing “all those white working-class voters” in the Democratic party.

Interestingly, as noted by the Huffington Post, McCaskill also referred to Hawley as a “bright shining object” while being interviewed by CNN, suggesting that her word choice has more to do with ageism than sexism or misogyny. Either way, this kind of dismissive language is definitely disappointing. Just about the last thing the Democratic party needs is in-fighting.

Liked it? Take a second to support Community on Patreon!

This is a Creative Commons article. The original version of this article appeared here.


  1. Sounds like McCaskill is munching on some sour grapes to me and is just trying to share. Out with the old and in with the new Congress. 2020 may bring us a new majority Senate too. Turn those sour grapes into a fine wine instead.

  2. I’m from that region & I’ve always liked McCaskill. That being said, I really don’t appreciate the demeaning attitude & comments she made about Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. That aberration is in squatting in our White House because people wanted change. I People are interested in a more Progressive agenda especially being screwed over with voter suppression & making health care unaffordable for again for so many. Missouri voters chose a more Progressive Agenda. Too bad the Senator didn’t go full on Progressive & the outcome may have been different. In the meantime, Democrats need to stop eating their own & come together with a more Progressive agenda & the old adage if you can’t say anything nice don’t say anything at all would be appropriate here for the ex-Senator.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here