Pelosi’s impeachment resolution provides legal boost to compel cooperation of crucial witnesses

329
ABC News / YouTube Trump and Pelosi s war of 1571332586.jpg...
ABC News / YouTube

House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump has already produced an astonishing amount of damning evidence, mostly provided by career public servants and appointees serving outside the walls of the West Wing. But as Democrats aim to secure testimony from high-ranking White House officials such as former national security adviser John Bolton, they will have a new legal arrow in their quiver.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s announcement Monday that the full House will vote on a formal impeachment resolution Thursday will put a final dagger through any remaining claim by the White House that the inquiry “lacks the necessary authorization” of a formal impeachment proceeding. Indeed, a federal judge ruled last week in a separate matter that the House inquiry was legally valid despite the lack of a formal vote. But the formal vote could provide a final push of legal momentum as the House works to compel the testimony of Trump’s inner circle of aides. Some observers view the case of former deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman as a test for whether the courts will side with Congress or the White House as Trump seeks to erect a wall around his inner circle of advisers through “absolute immunity” claims (i.e. executive privilege on steroids). Kupperman has asked a federal court to rule on whether a House subpoena for his testimony is valid and enforceable. The case was assigned on Monday to a federal judge from the U.S. District Court in D.C. Bolton is said to be watching for the outcome of that proceeding as he weighs whether to testify himself.

But also on the line are subpoenas seeking testimony from acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, and Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani—all of whom could provide crucial first-hand knowledge of Trump’s actions and intentions. Their efforts to avoid testifying will get just that much harder after Thursday.

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

3 Comments on "Pelosi’s impeachment resolution provides legal boost to compel cooperation of crucial witnesses"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico

..Trump’s behavior in office, is horrible.
And everyone knows it .
..The constitution mandates that impeachment , ,is necessary to ,by law remove Trump from office !
..If ,—our country decides to re-elect Trump , then we must recognize that our democracy has be destroyed for good.,
And we deserve what we’ve become , because we allowed a (minority) to destroy a (majority ) of Americans .
..We will have no one to blame but our selves.

chris whitley
Guest
chris whitley
This vote is a ploy. Gop wanted a vote. They are going to get a vote. The only thing wrong is Nancy and Adam are going to write the resolution. And it’s going to be basically republicans can kiss our ass. The resolution will have very special wording. Nancy ain’t going to give up her advantage. And even if it doesn’t pass ain’t no big deal. Court already said it’s an official impeachment proceedings. They just want to increase Adam Schiffs powers and get search warrants and add power of the court to subpoenas. And when they are ready move… Read more »
fishouttaH2o
Guest
fishouttaH2o
They have no intention of cooperating with any investigation in any manner and the vote won’t make any difference. Witnesses might be less likely to be intimidated into silence though. They’ve said all along the investigation is illegitimate and once it’s legitimate it won’t matter. They’re laying the groundwork already saying the witness testimony so far is tainted & they want to start all over again. Nonsense. They want a chance to grandstand & intimidate witnesses. They don’t care about the facts in the inquiry. They just criticize the process since that’s all they’ve got but they are following House… Read more »