They just can’t call spades, spades(sic), even as the GOP gets closer to copping to what has always been obvious about Trump, that he is neither charged nor infused. Nor is his racism cosmetic.
LOL, everyone made fun of @nytimes for using "racially charged" too much in their copy so they switched to "racially infused" instead. https://t.co/53VnPUdGiH
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) July 15, 2019
How about "infused with racism and aged for 73 years in a spray-tanned oak barrel of white supremacy"?
— Zach Pluhacek (@zachami) July 15, 2019
Amidst reluctance within some news outlets to categorize the president’s tweets for what they are, both @NorahODonnell and CBS News White House correspondent @weijia Jiang both made reference to Trump’s “racist tweets” without qualifiers. https://t.co/L7VbARMm59
— Evan Rosenfeld (@Evan_Rosenfeld) July 16, 2019
Do people flipping out about this tweet have any awareness of the long history of white racists using the terms "communist" & "socialist" to refer to people who aren't actually either but are simply Black, like Obama??? LOL https://t.co/68BVmSgP7w
— Bree Newsome Bass (@BreeNewsome) July 16, 2019
THE
WHITE-FRAGILITY
SELF-TESTgiven the "lexical economic anxiety" this @APStylebook update is causing people, here's a wonderful thread for anybody who might need ithttps://t.co/fSL5Q9IO7I
— Liza Sabater ???????????????????? (@blogdiva) March 30, 2019
Meanwhile, @CNN is laying out the obvious case that Wikileaks and Russia were in cahoots to elect Trump.
Who told you years ago that Assange was a front for Russian intelligence? That would be me.— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) July 16, 2019
Leave a Comment
Be the First to Comment!