New Evidence Emerges Regarding Nuclear Reactor Explosion in Russia: Now 7 Scientists Killed

270

As I first wrote about this last weekend, the nuclear accident occurring offshore in northern Russia’s Nenoska test site last Thursday continues to raise troubling questions for Western analysts. The death toll has risen to seven from the weekend report of five, according to a new New York Times report today. The offshore accident was followed by what local officials reported to be a spike in radioactivity in the area.

The official Russian explanation continues to involve “small scale sources of energy with the use of fissile materials. But, those explanations ring hollow to many American officials:

United States intelligence officials have said they suspect the blast involved a prototype of what NATO calls the SSC-X-9 Skyfall. That is a cruise missile that Mr. Putin has boasted can reach any corner of the earth because it is partially powered by a small nuclear reactor, eliminating the usual distance limitations of conventionally fueled missiles.

The accident would be the largest nuclear accident in Russia since Chernobyl, but all agree it would – in a worst case scenario – still be several magnitudes of severity lower than the Chernobyl incident .

The Russians purportedly developed the “Sky Fall” missiles in an attempt to evade North America’s nuclear missile defense shield.

In several recent Pentagon and other government reports, the prospect of a Russian nuclear-powered cruise missiles has been frequently cited as a potential new kind of threat. They are launched into the air and able to weave an unpredictable path at relatively low altitudes.

But even with the news surrounding the new threat, tests on the actual missile delivery system continued to be plagued by accidents even prior to last week’s more severe event. Meanwhile, Russia’s explanation for the accident continues to change as the death toll rises. Without regard to the official explanation, the accident may inform American specialists.

Beyond the human toll, American intelligence officials are questioning whether Mr. Putin’s grand dream of a revived arsenal evaporated in that mysterious explosion, or whether it was just an embarrassing setback in Moscow’s effort to build a new class of long-range and undersea weapons that the United States cannot intercept.

Increased candor and cooperation with Russia, perhaps leading to quicker and more truthful explanations, actually would be a benefit of having a president with prior good relations with Russia. However, as always, the “good relationship” Trump has with President Putin appears largely one-sided. Indeed, the two nations’ decision to rip up the former IBM restrictions signed decades ago by Ronald Reagan seems more indicative of two nations accelerating toward new and more dangerous weapons, weapons pointed at each other.

Meanwhile, American scientists are left largely guessing at the severity of the nuclear accident, and the radioactivity unleashed in the Russian Arctic. I will continue to follow the story as information warrants.

****

Peace, y’all.

Jason

jmiciak@yahoo.com

 

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

9 Comments on "New Evidence Emerges Regarding Nuclear Reactor Explosion in Russia: Now 7 Scientists Killed"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Markm Mitchell
Guest
Markm Mitchell

Another thoughtful article, Jason.

Calmdown
Guest
Calmdown

“Increased candor and cooperation with Russia, perhaps leading to quicker and more truthful explanations, actually would be a benefit of having a president with prior good relations with Russia.”

You mean like the Obama administration where Obama told Medvedev that he would have more flexibility with Russia after being reelected? The same administration that was in place when this missile was being built?

The first test of this missile was in June of 2016, mere months after the current administration took office. This egregious environmentally disastrous and military program was begun in an earlier administration.

Calmdown
Guest
Calmdown

By the way, Russians obfuscating the truth is historical. They didn’t start doing it in January of 2017.

Which brings about a correction in the above post. The original test was done during the Obama administration.

Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico

Obfuscation, ?? Trump wrote , ( or paid ) someone to ,write the book .
. You-all remember the (art of the deal)?
Soon to be reprinted as the
..(art of the steal ).
..OBFUSCATION , soon —to be a song ,
by Trump ? I don’t know if he can pronounce that , without inhaling, it would cover all of his 3 words sentences, from the his “stuttering “TelePrompTer.

Calmdown
Guest
Calmdown

What does any of what you just wrote have to do with the Russians historically lying? They lied during the Obama administration and they are lying now. It didn’t start with the Trump administration and it didn’t start with the Obama administration. Acting like this is something new and if we only had a cordial relationship with the Russians it would be different is fantasy.

Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico
We are speaking more of Trumps lies, which are to numerous to mention. ..,He’s the President now .What he says , is what’s causing the problems now . We could have worried about Obama’s so called lies , when he was president, but it’s no longer relevant. ..Putin’s lie’s , backed up by Trump, about interfering with our elections ,is what it’s all about presently. Cooperation with Russia is , and has always been ,pretty much impossible. …While Russia ,and North Korea , want to have talks , its only to delay any sanctions that would be imposed against them… Read more »
Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico

Wow , that makes it OK then ?
Russia , if your listening,
keep up the good work !!

Calmdown
Guest
Calmdown

Ummm. NO. It just makes it reality.

Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico

Is this results of Trump , ripping up the treatments y.
And why is Trump’s tepid response ,
or not at all . He seems tongue tied when he talks with Putin. That “ GOLDER SHOWERING “
Seems to have him paralyzed .