Even before they were elected, those of us interested in foreign policy issues knew that Rep. Tlaib and Rep. Omar were viewed as an enormous threat by repressive regimes in the Middle-East who wanted to maintain their power. As outspoken black and brown muslim women they bring a perspective that has long been lacking in US political debate about the middle-east. We’ve always known they had targets on their back.
Last week, Republican minority leader Kevin McCarthy threatened “action” against Rep. Omar and Rep. Tlaib. This was days before Rep. Omar wrote the seven words in two tweets that she was criticized for. Keep that in mind. Republicans said last week they would “take action”, and they’ve been lying in wait. They have been planning a character assassination of Rep. Omar for months.
I will let Rev. Barber remind us why we should not fall for Republican bullshit.
If Dems bow rather than call it out, they will undermine their own future.
This is not left vs right but right vs wrong.
— Rev. Dr. Barber (@RevDrBarber) February 12, 2019
Rev. Barber is absolutely right. We should not be cornered by Republicans into condemning people who are actually fighting for justice. Definitely not over the unintentionally questionable choice of words. Definitely not when they are so willing to learn and quick to apologize for unintended hurt.
Instead, let us keep our focus on actual, real injustice, the WRONG which Rev. Barber refers to. Rep. Omar’s most eager critics actively support injustices and harms to oppressed people. Here’s Peter Beinart laying it out:
But if we’re going to demand that politicians apologize for any hint of association with bigotry, let’s not stop with Ilhan Omar. Let’s hold her critics to the same standard.
Establishing two legal systems in the same territory—one for Jews and one for Palestinians, as Israel does in the West Bank—is bigotry. Guaranteeing Jews in the West Bank citizenship, due process, free movement and the right to vote for the government that controls their lives while denying those rights to their Palestinian neighbors is bigotry. It’s a far more tangible form of bigotry than Omar’s flirtation with anti-Semitic tropes. And it has lasted for more than a half-century.
Yet almost all of Omar’s Republican critics in Congress endorse this bigotry. The 2016 Republican platform declares that, “We reject the false notion that Israel is an occupier” in the West Bank. In other words, governing Jews by one set of laws and Palestinians by another is fine. Last December, Republican Congressman Lee Zeldin, who has called for stripping Omar of her committee assignments, spoke at a fundraiser for Bet El, a West Bank settlement from which Palestinians are barred from living even though it was built—according to the Israeli supreme court—on land confiscated from its Palestinian owners.
For her tweets, Omar was publicly rebuked by the entire Democratic House leadership. For his enthusiastic endorsement of land theft and state-sponsored bigotry in the West Bank, Zeldin has received no congressional criticism at all. To the contrary, he’s a Republican rising star. — forward.com/…
Beinart is right, the actual harm done to millions of Palestinians lives should take primacy here. But virtually our entire political class chose instead to police the words of a young, black, female legislator.
We only need to look at the Democratic Senate minority leader and (unfortunately) my senator Chuck Schumer. He jumped at the opportunity to say that Ilhan Omar’s seven word analysis of the situation was “reprehensible”.
Why is he doing this when he knows full well that the Saudi and UAE lobbies are gunning for Rep. Omar and Rep. Tlaib?
Academics, media outlets, and commentators close to Persian Gulf governments have repeatedly accused Omar, Rashida Tlaib (another newly elected Muslim congresswoman), and Abdul El-Sayed (who made a failed bid to become governor of Michigan) of being secret members of the Muslim Brotherhood who are hostile to the governments of Saudi Arabia and the UAE. On Sunday, Saudi-owned Al Arabiya published a feature insinuating that Omar and Tlaib were part of an alliance between the Democratic Party and Islamist groups to control Congress. The article accused the two of being “anti-Trump and his political team and options, especially his foreign policy starting from the sanctions on Iran to the isolation of the Muslim Brotherhood and all movements of political Islam.” — foreignpolicy.com/…
Schumer owes his entire career in politics to wall-street fundraising, he is a walking, talking illustration of the disastrous impact of money in politics. So perhaps it’s no surprise that he is taking a stance supported by the Saudi and UAE lobbies. He also thinks it’s a good idea to speak at AIPAC, a lobbying organization that has cultivated and supported bigots like John Hagee, an avid Trump supporter.
The Trump administration, which has deeply corrupt ties to the ruling Saudi faction is also blasting Omar.
.@IlhanMN tweets were a disgrace & her apology was inadequate. Anti-Semitism has no place in the United States Congress, much less the Foreign Affairs Committee. Those who engage in anti-Semitic tropes should not just be denounced, they should face consequences for their words.
— Vice President Mike Pence (@VP) February 13, 2019
Why is Schumer aiding Pence in attacking Ilhan Omar? Why doesn’t Schumer ask instead when Republicans going to condemn Rep. Paul Gosar for attending far-right white nationalist rallies? The Republican caucus is stocked full of right-wing extremists. For example, Duncan Hunter, who ran an openly bigoted, Islamophobic campaign in 2018. Schumer doesn’t have time to combat them, but he is more than willing to condemn a first-term black, Muslim legislator? Is that really where he thinks the threat of anti-semitism lies in this country? In Ilhan Omar’s tweets?
Money, in the form of bundling and directing member’s political contributions is exactly what AIPAC uses to influence policy, as do all lobbying organization. This was fully in view yesterday when AIPAC turned around and sent a fund-raising appeal using Rep. Ilhan Omar as a bogeyman:
The pro-Israel lobby sent its donors an email on Tuesday urging them to give money to the group as an answer to Omar’s tweets earlier this week, in which she accused AIPAC of using money to “buy” members of Congress and said that U.S. support for Israel is “all about the Benjamins baby.” […]
While many accepted the apology, U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters at a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday he thought Omar was insincere and should resign from Congress.
“What she said is so deep-seated in her heart,” he said, referring to the comments, adding that the Minnesota representative’s apology was “lame and she didn’t mean a word of it.” — www.haaretz.com/…
Yeah, that’s right, AIPAC is literally raising money to influence policy and Trump is accusing people of insincerity. Why are Democrats enabling this bullshit? Especially when it’s coming from gaslighters like Trump?
Also…his closing argument in 2016 was an ad with narration about a "global power structure" and "global special interests," voiced over images of prominent Jews. https://t.co/QLBClJEnfi
— Catherine Rampell (@crampell) February 13, 2019
Why is Schumer attacking Omar instead of Donald Trump, who actually ran an openly anti-semitic ad in 2016? Trump, whose entire campaign was built on the anti-semitic, Nazi slogan “America First”?
Wait, it gets even better. In 2015, Trump told the Republican Jewish Coalition this:
“You’re not gonna support me because I don’t want your money… you don’t want to give me money, but that’s ok, you want to control your own politicians that’s fine.” — www.washingtonpost.com/…
Trump openly told a Jewish audience that they wanted to use money to “control your own politicians”. Where in the ever-loving fuck was Schumer’s deep seated need to police anti-semitic statements then? Trump, even as presidential candidate had far, far more power than a first term Congresswoman. WaPo has done a run-down of all Trump’s anti-semitic rhetoric. He called Gary Cohn a globalist, and when actual Nazis were shouting “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville, Trump said they wer “very fine people”.
Yet Schumer chose to police Rep. Omar’s tweets instead of a New York billionaire’s platform when he was running for president. G.T.F.O.H.
We call @IlhanMN & @RashidaTlaib "the first Muslim women elected to Congress" because the first Muslim was @keithellison. He was also viciously vilified as an anti-Semite – by the DNC's largest billionaire donor. Perhaps there's a pattern to be seen here? https://t.co/EW1ARYZVp4
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 11, 2019
I am not going to support people who choose to punch down at well-meaning activist-politicians like Rep. Omar, but don’t have stomach to take on Trump or Pence. And I agree with Chris Hayes, many powerful Democrats do not seem to have grasped just how far the Democratic base has shifted.
I really don't think the Democratic establishment and AIPAC and others have quite grasped just how much they are losing and have lost wide swaths of the Democratic party base.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) February 12, 2019
In the midst of the kerfuffle about word choice, the actual content of Rep. Omar’s critique has been forgotten. AIPAC is no different from the Saudi lobby, the military-industrial lobby, the pharma lobby, the financial industry lobby. They all seek to use money and influence to further their objectives. And they brag about their ability to do so.
In 2005, Steven Rosen, then a senior official with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, sat down for dinner with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, then of the New Yorker. “You see this napkin?” Rosen asked Goldberg. “In twenty-four hours, [AIPAC] could have the signatures of seventy senators on this napkin.” […]
Rosen, after all, wasn’t the first AIPAC official to boast about the the raw power that “America’s bipartisan pro-Israel lobby” exercises in Washington, D.C. Go back earlier, to 1992, when then-AIPAC President David Steiner was caught on tape bragging that he had “cut a deal” with the George H.W. Bush White House to provide $3 billion in U.S. aid to Israel. Steiner also claimed to be “negotiating” with the incoming Clinton administration over the appointment of pro-Israel cabinet members. AIPAC, he said, has “a dozen people in [the Clinton] campaign, in the headquarters … and they’re all going to get big jobs.” — theintercept.com/…
So what exactly did Omar say that has not been said a hundred times by actual AIPAC representatives? Here’s Noah Kulwin in Jewish Currents laying it all out:
The Israel lobby, especially AIPAC, has long greased the wheels of American politics by bundling millions of dollars for campaign contributions and spending further millions on sending politicians and journalists on junkets to Israel, where they meet with government officials and absorb pro-Israel talking points under the thin pretense of a fact-finding mission. However earnest these groups may be about their support for Israel, they are explicitly in the business of trading influence for money. This isn’t limited to AIPAC; for instance, casino magnate and right-wing Israel supporter Sheldon Adelson and his wife Miriam spent $55 million in the 2018 election cycle to maintain Republican control of Congress. In recent years, the interests of these groups have dovetailed with those of Saudi Arabia and other Gulf monarchies, defense contractors, millenarian evangelical Christian Zionists, and other assorted war hawks. The Israel lobby is indeed a big tent, and it has welcomed in a wide range of right-wing interests that extend beyond the American Jewish community. — jewishcurrents.org/…
Saudi Arabia and other Gulf monarchies, defense contractors, millenarian evangelical Christian Zionists, and other assorted war hawks are not our allies. They are not the people I want Democrats to associate with. So yeah, when this group rushes to condemn someone, we should not be aiding and abetting them.
One of the reasons I’ve always been interested in Israel/Palestine is that it’s a clarifying issue. The only correct policy view has always been crystal clear. It’s equal rights for Palestinians. Yet, since advocates for Palestinians have almost no real political power in the US, equal rights has never been the US position. So whenever we run across a politician who makes rushes to make excuses for the oppression of Palestinians, we should recognize that they are willing to compromise our basic principles of equality and justice, in the pursuit of power. They are willing to tolerate harm to the powerless, to achieve their ends.
Why are we letting Trump, Pence, extremist Republicans and gross human rights violators like the Saudis and UAE get away with character assassination of yet another young, black, muslim leader?
I am not going to aid and abet this bullshit.
Trump has no moral authority to call on anybody to resign. https://t.co/lWTd6RXCy5
— Rev. Dr. Barber (@RevDrBarber) February 13, 2019
I am not going to lay down cover as the Saudis, UAE, AIPAC, Trump and Pence seek to assassinate the character of a black woman fighting for what’s right.
I know what side I am on.
I am not going to be gaslighted into partnering with Trump or the Saudi monarchy or Mike Pence.
I am going to ally with Rev. Barber.
I am on Ady Barkan’s side.
It’s the side all Democrats should all be on.
I stand with Ilhan Omar.