Hiding Behind False and Misleading Claims, Biden Refuses to Commit to Signing Medicare for All Bill as President

The Obama White House / YouTube VP Biden Sets the Record Straight 1583861264.jpg...
The Obama White House / YouTube

One of corporate Democrats’ most common talking points against Medicare for All is that such a proposal would never make it through Congress. But Joe Biden, in an interview that aired Monday night, admitted that even if one did—with the approval of his own party—he would not necessarily jump at the historic chance to sign it into law.

Validating Sen. Bernie Sanders’ call for a debate with Biden on the details and merits of Medicare for All, the former vice president described Sanders’ plan as a budget-busting proposal—without mentioning studies showing it would save the U.S. trillions of dollars—and refused to commit to signing Medicare for All legislation if Congress sent it to his desk, claiming it could delay coverage expansion.

“I would veto anything that delays providing the security and the certainty of healthcare being available now,” Biden told MSNBC‘s Lawrence O’Donnell, who asked Biden how he, if elected president, would handle a situation in which Medicare for All legislation passed a Democrat-controlled Congress.

Biden’s remarks were widely interpreted as a suggestion that he would consider vetoing Medicare for All, which—under Sanders’ version—would be phased in over a four-year period, lowering the Medicare eligibility age to 55 in the first year and covering everyone in the U.S. by year four. A public option would also be established during the transition period.

“If Democrats passed a Medicare for All bill through the House and Senate, it would be one of the greatest legislative accomplishments in American history. It would realign American politics for a generation or more… and Joe Biden suggested that he might veto it,” tweeted journalist Walker Bragman.

While criticizing supposed “delays” in coverage expansion under Medicare for All, Biden failed to mention that his plan—according to the former vice president’s own campaign website—would leave millions of Americans uninsured by only covering 97% of the U.S. population.

Biden insisted that he supports the “principle” behind Medicare for All—providing healthcare as a right—but opposes the policy because he believes it is impractical and would raise taxes on the middle class, a right-wing talking point that ignores the savings most U.S. families would see via Medicare for All’s elimination of premiums, co-pays, and deductibles.

“My opposition isn’t to the principle that you should have Medicare,” Biden said. “My opposition relates to whether or not, a, it’s doable, and, two, what the cost is and what the consequences to the rest of the budget are. How are going to find $35 trillion over the next 10 years without having profound impacts on everything from taxes for middle class, working class people, as well as the impact on the rest of the budget?”

A Yale study released last month showed that Medicare for All, contrary to Biden’s depiction of the policy as prohibitively expensive, would save the U.S. $450 billion annually in overall healthcare spending. The study also found that Medicare for All would save 68,000 lives each year.

“Joe Biden is pretending he’s worried about how much Medicare for All would cost,” tweeted writer and researcher Andrew Perez. “Odds are his plan would cost much more, just like this analysis of [Pete Buttigieg’s] plan found, because it adds new costs while preserving an extraordinarily brutal, inefficient system.”

Adam Gaffney, president of Physicians for a National Health Program, argued in a blog post for Health Affairs on Monday that Medicare for All is both economically and politically viable.

“At the end of the day, the vast majority of the nation could benefit from single-payer reform—and that fact makes it winnable,” Gaffney wrote. “Above all, however, we can be sure of one thing: not bothering to push for Medicare for All today will guarantee that it doesn’t happen tomorrow.”

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

5 Comments on "Hiding Behind False and Misleading Claims, Biden Refuses to Commit to Signing Medicare for All Bill as President"

avatar
newest oldest most voted
carol levy
Guest
carol levy

“I would veto anything that delays providing the security and the certainty of healthcare being available now, maybe this means I wont make a promise when I have no idea how a bill would read

Nobsartist
Guest
Nobsartist

If you remember, he did that with Obamacare and he was able to read that….

Nobsartist
Guest
Nobsartist

Joe is a Warren Commission Democrat. He just could never match any Kennedy. Bought and paid for, Joe has made millions from healthcare stocks just like all of the rest of them. He wants to keep a system that pays 300 healthcare corporation CEO’s a minimum of 5 million per year Each and most a lot more because it makes sense…..

Sid Waxman
Guest
Sid Waxman
I’m retired and enjoying the benefits of Medicare. I think all Americans are entitled quality affordable healthcare. Let’s make that a reality. Oh! And let’s tell Joe Biden that he is radically wrong when his healthcare plan leaves 10 million people uninsured. Let’s keep him out of the White House. It may seem like I’m unrealistic, but I know that all of us would be in better hands if we were to elect Elizabeth Warren. I’m thinking writing her name in on the ballot in November. Warren was the only candidate with relevant federal experience, but she is a women… Read more »
carol levy
Guest
carol levy
no matter whom the nominee we need to have one goal and one goal only and that is to end the nightmare of Trump and #moscowmitch If you want more GOPcourtpacking (and they have filled 1/4 fed vacancies with proven racist, ABA rated unqualified and right wing ideologues and will do same with Scotus Ginsburg and Breyer both in their 80’s there will be at least one if not more vacancies for them to pack further (sometimes roberts like with ACA does not vote the 5 -4 but GOP moscow mitch stays in right wing and evisceration rights workers minorituies… Read more »