‘Absolute immunity’ isn’t executive privilege, it’s just another unprecedented Trump abuse of power

The Ring of Fire / YouTube Trump Tries To Claim Immunity Over 1561051358.jpg...
The Ring of Fire / YouTube

If Donald Trump isn’t above the law, you would never know it. He got away with colluding with Russia to win in 2016, and now he’s openly seeking foreign assistance for a repeat in 2020. He committed criminal acts of obstruction from right inside the Oval Office, and yet he’s experienced no consequence for those actions. Now, as Congress tries to investigate those obstructive acts, Trump and his attorneys have made an unprecedented assertion of absolute immunity over anything and everything related to actions he has taken in the White House.

So-called absolute immunity was the claim White House and Department of Justice lawyers made Wednesday at a Judiciary Committee hearing in order to rebuff every question asked of former Trump aide Hope Hicks regarding her time serving as White House communications director. At the closed-door hearing, Hicks wouldn’t even divulge where her desk was located in the West Wing due to her made-up immunity shield. The blanket immunity claimed by Hicks and administration lawyers is akin to the blanket assertions of executive privilege Trump has made over all redacted portions of the Mueller report, all documents related to the 2020 census citizenship question, and other materials.

Just to be clear, absolute immunity isn’t a thing, nor are blanket assertions of executive privilege—or at least they weren’t pre-Trump. What the White House is now claiming on a regular basis amounts to a form of executive immunity, which is wholly different from the way limited assertions of executive privilege have been used by presidents in the past.

“It’s important to distinguish between executive immunity and executive privilege,” former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade explained on an episode of the podcast Talking Feds. McQuade recalled that George W. Bush’s White House tried to claim executive immunity to block his former White House Counsel, Harriet Miers, from having to testify about a scandal involving the mass firing of U.S. Attorneys. As McQuade noted, that argument tanked in court, with a federal judge ruling that top aides to Bush weren’t immune from congressional subpoenas.

Executive privilege has traditionally been used like a scalpel rather than the bludgeon Trump has turned it into. There’s a limited number of materials and conversations over which a president can claim executive privilege. “You have to show up and you have to go question by question,” McQuade explained of White House aides subpoenaed to testify.

That doesn’t amount to Trump’s White House just blacking out a top aide’s entire tenure in the West Wing, as it did Wednesday during the Hicks testimony. And it certainly doesn’t mean Trump can simply block aides from giving any testimonial at all, as he is currently doing with former White House counsel Don McGahn. “I think it’s a very aggressive move to assert executive immunity and say these people don’t even have to show up to the hearing,” McQuade observed. “Ultimately, they’ll lose in the courts.”

In the meantime, Trump and his lawyers are creating privileges that never existed and totally upsetting the balance of power that once regulated our co-equal branches of government.

Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.

Leave a Comment

6 Comments on "‘Absolute immunity’ isn’t executive privilege, it’s just another unprecedented Trump abuse of power"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Allan
Guest
Allan

Becoming more like a corrupt Regime everyday. This is exactly the Authoritarian dictators rule book. The Iran distraction fits perfectly too.
Bad things happen when good people do nothing.
I simply cannot beleive history is repeating itself in the proud old USA & not some 3rd World Autocratic nation.
Every day he holds that office is legitimising his actions & reinforcing his ideals. This is going to end badly people.

Michael owens
Guest
Michael owens

Exactly Allan. Is there any Americans who can stop the crime family. Everybody says he’s not above the law?. But it appears he is !!!??

Allan
Guest
Allan

All it takes is the repuplicans to say, Whaoo, this is not right. This behaviour is not worthy of the highest office. Gone on too long. They are all complicit if they never speak out.
Not likely with the spinless right..

Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico
Of course, “all it takes “ is for the Republicans to stand up for the rule of law . ..But it seems to be “to much” to ask, for them to “honor their sworn responsibility to the constitution”. ..And-choose their country over their party …They have become gutless wonders ….And I hope we all remember when we vote … Death by Trump , is what the “Repugnant Republicans “ should be known for and their cowardly behavior , supporting Trump’s lies and illegal activities. They’ve become “ lier’s by proxy “. .. It should destroy them all , next election.
Robert Burnett
Guest
Robert Burnett

Someone should wipe that silly a$$ smile off of hicks face. Lock her up for contempt. And if Trumps lawyers don’t like it, lock that asses up. It’s time to quit pissing around with these crooks.

Dick Panico
Guest
Dick Panico

Well let’s face it , HOPE , IS TRULY A HICK .As a supporter of trump she’s lost all credibility…
..So theirs no HOPE , for Hicks …And in fact it appears ,most of Trumps supporters are ….. Hicks and hacks!!!!!