vd_vdt / Flickr Was It Legal What Scholars Are...
vd_vdt / Flickr

NYT is reporting the conclusions if the IG report

The former F.B.I. director James B. Comey was insubordinate in his handling of the investigation of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential election, a critical Justice Department report has concluded, according to officials and others who saw or were briefed on it.

But the report, by the department’s inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, does not challenge the decision not to prosecute Mrs. Clinton. Nor does it conclude that political bias at the F.B.I. influenced that decision, the officials said.

Developing story

It goes on to mention other instances of misbehavior of the agency like the text between agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Citing that because if his views Strzok may have prioritized Russia over Clinton email investigation but fell short of impropriety or influenced the investigation per se

The sharply criticizes the judgment of Mr. Comey, who injected the F.B.I. into presidential politics in ways not seen since at least the Watergate era.

Mr. Comey held a news conference in July 2016 to announce that he was recommending no charges against Mrs. Clinton and to publicly chastise her email practices. It was highly unorthodox; the Justice Department, not the F.B.I., makes charging decisions. And officials have been reprimanded for injecting their opinions into legal conclusions.

Finally the nail in the coffin was his October “surprise”

Then in late October, over the objection of top Justice Department officials, Mr. Comey sent a letter to Congress disclosing that agents were scrutinizing new evidence in the Clinton case. That evidence did not change the outcome of the inquiry, but Mrs. Clinton and many of her supporters blame Mr. Comey’s late disclosure for her defeat.

Liked it? Take a second to support Associate Editor on Patreon!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here